SPECIAL MARKET REVIEW: President Trump’s “Liberation Day” stock market reaction with future considerations…

NOTE: Every week, we post a “WEEKLY MARKET REVIEW.” If you’d like to keep in the loop with market news and economic trends, SUBSCRIBE for the free weekly newsletter.

Trump’s “Liberation Day” sparks a risk-off reaction in stock markets as they adjust to “worse-than-expected” tariffs. Yet, there’s a silver lining: markets were already oversold, and trade policy uncertainty typically fades quickly in history. With tariff clarity emerging, markets can now shift focus to pricing in future expectations. 

REF: ISABELNET

Trump’s “Liberation Day” on April 3, 2025, triggered a profound selloff in the stock markets, …

a knee-jerk reaction I view as a risk-off day akin to the repricing for “worse-than-expected” tariffs. It’s premature to gauge the lasting impact on investors, as outcomes hinge on complex, unresolved factors. For instance, if a country drops tariffs on U.S. imports, the U.S. might reciprocate, though this varies by product, adding layers of intricacy. Companies promising investments in the U.S. could dodge or delay tariffs, sparking further negotiations—assuming Washington has the manpower to handle it, which I doubt. I expect clearer White House announcements soon, but retaliatory tariffs seem unlikely; they’d escalate tensions, and the unpredictable figure in charge thrives on keeping others guessing. Still, with markets oversold and trade uncertainty historically short-lived, as seen in past cycles, clarity should soon allow forward-looking pricing, tempering the initial shock.

This presentation board, used by President Trump today, is over-simplified and lacks details.  Real tariffs are product specific and the real trade details are also much more complex than what was presented.  However, it got lots of reactions and will draw more parties to start negotiations with the US.

REF: Statista

For near-term stock market planning, I’d favor investing in specific companies over broad indexes, given the uneven impact of tariffs and incentives. U.S. consumption, a key driver, remains resilient: the top 10% of households (earning $250K+) account for 50% of it, while the middle-income group ($55K–$250K) contributes 25–30%, leaving the lowest earners with the rest—though they’ll grumble loudest. Businesses, not consumers, face the real upheaval, forced to rethink production amid White House incentives. This points to short-term volatility, with negotiations taking center stage, but recovery should unfold within 12 months at worst. Markets will stabilize as companies adapt and tariff details solidify, buoyed by robust consumption and strategic corporate moves.

The recent tariff announcements from the White House, also paired with a drop in the 10-year Treasury bond yield, create a complex economic signal that can be interpreted in several ways. Let’s break down the potential meanings of the yield drop—recession fears, disinflation, lower mortgage rates, or expectations of an earlier Federal Reserve rate cut—based on current dynamics and economic principles.

REF: CNBC

A dropping 10-year Treasury yield generally reflects shifts in investor sentiment and expectations about the future. 

Yields fall when bond prices rise, which happens when demand for these safe-haven assets increases. This can occur for various reasons, and the tariff context adds a layer of nuance.

1. Sign of Recession?
   

   A declining 10-year yield can signal recession concerns, especially if it coincides with an inverted yield curve (where short-term yields exceed long-term ones). Tariffs, by raising costs on imported goods, could slow economic growth if businesses pass costs to consumers or reduce investment due to uncertainty. Investors might flock to Treasuries & bonds, pushing yields down, if they fear tariffs will tip the economy into a downturn. Recent economic resilience—GDP growth above 2.8% in 2024—suggests no immediate recession, but prolonged tariff uncertainty could shift this outlook, particularly if consumer spending or jobs weaken.

2. Disinflation?
   

   Disinflation—a slowing rate of inflation—could also explain falling yields. If tariffs dampen demand by raising prices, economic activity might cool, reducing inflationary pressure. Investors might then expect lower inflation ahead, requiring less yield to offset it. Core PCE inflation dropped to 1.9% in late 2024, below the Fed’s 2% target, supporting this view. However, tariffs are typically inflationary in the short term due to higher import costs, so this interpretation hinges on growth worries outweighing price pressures.

3. Mortgage Rates Coming Down?
   

   The 10-year Treasury yield directly influences mortgage rates, often serving as a benchmark. A drop from, say, 4.79% in January to 4.1% or lower (as seen recently) would likely pull mortgage rates down, easing borrowing costs for homebuyers. This aligns the idea of relief for younger buyers struggling with high rates. While tariffs might not directly cause this, the yield drop reflects broader market dynamics that could make housing more affordable short-term.  Current 30-Year fixed jumbo mortgage rate stands at 6.63% as of 4/3/2025.

4. Expectations of a Fed Cut Sooner?
   

   Falling yields can signal that markets anticipate Federal Reserve action, such as an earlier rate cut. If tariffs threaten growth, the Fed might lower its federal funds rate (currently 4.25%-4.50% as of March 2025) to stimulate the economy. Futures markets recently shifted to price in a May or June 2025 cut, up from later expectations, reflecting this possibility. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has indicated flexibility—holding rates if inflation persists, cutting if growth falters—tying this scenario to tariff impacts.  Could all of the above part of the president’s plan to have US rates come down sooner?

REF: MorgageNewsDaily

Putting It Together – What does all this mean:

The tariff announcements introduce uncertainty, potentially raising inflation short-term but risking growth longer-term. 

The yield drop—possibly to 4.1% or below by April 2025—suggests markets are leaning toward growth concerns over inflation fears, supported by sentiment on X and recent data showing yields declining despite tariff news. This points to a mix of recession worries and Fed cut expectations driving the trend, with disinflation as a secondary factor if growth slows. Lower mortgage rates are a practical outcome, already in motion as yields fall.

In short, the yield drop likely reflects a market betting on economic slowdown (recession risk) and anticipating Fed intervention, with mortgage relief as a tangible side effect. 

The tariff effect remains fluid—growth fears dominate now, but inflationary spikes could shift this balance if they materialize. Keep an eye on jobs data and inflation readings; they’ll clarify which signal strengthens.

One Bright Spot…

President Trump’s claim of $6 trillion to $7 trillion in investment commitments from various companies and groups into the U.S. economy highlights a potential bright spot amid the turbulence of his “Liberation Day” tariff policies in 2025.

This figure, often cited in his speeches and White House statements, reflects a wave of pledges from major corporations and foreign entities, spurred by his administration’s push to reshore manufacturing and bolster domestic production. While the exact total remains fluid and unverified as of April 4, 2025, it’s a rallying cry for economic optimism, suggesting a massive influx of capital that could fuel jobs and growth, even as markets grapple with short-term volatility from tariffs.

The breakdown of this colossal sum includes high-profile commitments: Apple’s $500 billion for AI servers and manufacturing, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’s (TSMC) $100 billion (potentially rising from a prior $65 billion) for chip plants, SoftBank’s $100–200 billion for AI and data centers, and the UAE’s $1.4 trillion over a decade for AI, semiconductors, and energy. Other players like Nvidia, Oracle, and Johnson & Johnson have pledged hundreds of billions collectively, while Trump has hinted at Saudi Arabia upping its $600 billion promise to $1 trillion. These figures, totaling over $3 trillion by some counts as early as March 2025, suggest the $6–7 trillion range could be plausible if more deals materialize. However, much of this remains aspirational—pledges aren’t signed contracts, and historical precedent shows not all promised investments fully deliver. Still, this flood of intent signals confidence in Trump’s vision, offering a counterweight to tariff-driven uncertainty with the promise of long-term economic revitalization.